Best Practices for Collaborative Planning on State Trust Lands


The research team developed a set of Best Practices based on input from participants who were interviewed and on the research team’s cross-case analysis of the eight cases. These best practices provide guidance to state trust land managers and other stakeholders interested in creating, guiding or participating in a collaborative planning process.

The best practices describe effective ways to decide when to collaborate, to set up a successful process, to determine who will participate, to organizing a successful process, to create a decision-making structure, to help participants work together, to deal with information and to implement agreements.

Some of the best practices include:


When deciding when to collaborate…

• Identify all stakeholders and determine if those who are necessary for a successful outcome are interested in participating and if their participation is legally appropriate.

• Assess the situation and the incentives facing potential participants when deciding whether or not to invest time and resources in collaborative planning.

• Secure support and resources from trust land agency decision makers for the collaborative planning effort.

To set up a successful process…

• Define the collaborative planning process and specifically relate it to agency decision making. 

• Determine whether other legal processes are ongoing or if other legal constraints exist and assess how these factors will affect the process.

  • Identify process objectives and create ground rules as a group at the outset of the collaborative effort.

To determine who will participate…

• Involve representatives of all affected interests, document how they were selected and establish procedures to adjust membership composition.

• Clearly define interests and responsibilities for each participant involved in the process.  

• Hold representatives accountable for their responsibility to their interest group.

• Include local public officials. 

To organize the process…

• Take advantage of various legal tools to structure the collaborative group.

• Set and adhere to a timeline and deadlines, recognizing that collaborative processes often require more time than initially thought.

• Consider allowing parties to jointly select and fund a professional, neutral and knowledgeable facilitator.

To create a decision-making structure…

• Distinguish between decision-making power and decision-making authority and clarify how power is shared in the process.  

• Agree on a clearly-defined decision rule and specify voting procedures at the outset of the collaborative process.

• Consider using minority reports or decision matrices to make difficult decisions.

To help participants work together…

• Encourage relationship-building through formal and informal activities to help the collaborative group overcome stereotypes and foster trust and cooperation.

• Identify unstated interests as early as possible to ensure transparency and avoid miscommunication leading to impasses.

• Communicate frequently with the trust land decision makers if they do not have a seat at the table.

• Update the public periodically about the collaborative process and encourage public comment.

To share information…

• Reserve meeting time to learn about the trust mandate and other legal constraints; do not assume that this information is commonly understood.

• Determine from the outset what scientific information is necessary and work to acquire it before moving forward.  

• Use subcommittees or task forces to research scientific and technical issues for the larger group.  

• Request legal or policy clarification from the state attorney general or agency officials when needed.

When implementing agreements…

• Focus at the outset on creating a final written agreement that will satisfy the trust mandate. 

• Create measures of success in the final agreement.

• Create an implementation structure that builds on the relationships established during the collaborative process.